But Mr. Stallman thinks the user should not be told about the option to use the system with only a few non-free components. Not only is this censorship, he is harming his cause.
Sometimes, free software is not enough. Sometimes, you need proprietary
software to accompany free software and make it work. Surely a system with
mostly free components and a single proprietary component is better than a
fully proprietary system.
- [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? adel . afzal
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? LDrumbler
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? jadonplevesque
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd fr... LDrumbler
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hu... jadonplevesque
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? Andrew Roffey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? lloyd
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is Debian GNU/Hurd free? davesamcdxv