In any case, if you want to try to take Wikipedia and improve it in the more traditional way, you're free to do so. Good luck!
Wikipedia is inefficient, absolutely, but writing a libre encyclopedia in
this way is a lot more effective than a more traditional way, regardless of
how efficient it is or isn't. That's why Wikipedia has succeeded where other
libre encyclopedias have failed.
- [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia marioxcc . MT
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia lovexdrew
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia tomlukeywood
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia blade . vp2020
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia marioxcc . MT
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedi... marioxcc . MT
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia jueshq
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia David Englund
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedi... tomlukeywood
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wiki... David Englund
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia marioxcc . MT
- [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia Jeremiah Asbury