I was asking for alternatives, not about how to start my own encyclopedia. I have never proposed building an encyclopedia by “traditional” means. If you're implying that any encyclopedia must be Wikipedia-like or traditional, then I disagree, but I won't engage into a discussion about that; that has never been my intention since I created this thread. Some fellow users asked about what is wrong with Wikipedia and that is why I wrote #7.
Wikipedia has been moderately effective, I agree. I have contributed a tiny
bit to make it better serve society and therefore also more effective.
- [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia marioxcc . MT
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia lovexdrew
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia tomlukeywood
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia blade . vp2020
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia marioxcc . MT
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedi... marioxcc . MT
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia jueshq
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia David Englund
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedi... tomlukeywood
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wiki... David Englund
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia marioxcc . MT
- [Trisquel-users] Alternatives to Wikipedia Jeremiah Asbury