I don't think the reason that free hardware was unsuccessful in the past was
because of a lack of standards. I think it was due to lack of demand for free
hardware from the mainstream. There's a reason that Intel is so popular, and
that is because it can run Windows and has been around for decades.
Similarly I would argue that the Beaglebone Black (which *is* free hardware)
is successful because it has been widely adopted by hackers and developers
for electronics prototyping, and because it has good support. The BBB has
demand from people other than free software enthusiasts, which gives it more
appeal. For the Computer Card to be successful I think it will have to appeal
in this way.
Now, I totally support the EOMA standard, especially because it plans for the
future and compatibility on the way to solve electronics waste. I think it
will be great for allowing upstream projects (*especially* the Linux kernel)
to target it.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future of Libre Computing: Crowd ... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future of Libre Computing: Crowd ... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future of Libre Computing: C... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future of Libre Computin... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future of Libre Comp... luke . leighton
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future of Libre ... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future of L... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future ... dguthrie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future ... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future ... dguthrie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future ... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future of L... luke . leighton
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future of Libre ... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] The future of Libre Computing: Crowd ... svhaab