So, to recap:
You skimmed through Alina's fundraising page, and concluded that there is a
"lack of transparency" because you missed the statement where it is explained
what he is accused of doing, while at the same time assuming that he is
gullible without proof.
Then you read a news article according to which my friend is accused of
amphetamine possession, and you post here claiming that the accusation is for
methamphetamine possession which is a different compound (not a trivial
difference, because while amphetamine is safe and therefore used
therapeutically, metamphetamine is harmful in its primary use).
Now again you show your functional illiteracy. My friend never "exploded a
coffee". I should note that nowhere does the article that you linked, which
is from 8 years ago, says that the coffee "exploded" or even that anybody was
hurt. That my friend may have played a teenager's practical joke which people
made a big fuss about, is a different matter.
Sputnik News made it up that my friend is rich along with the term "Golden
Youth". If you make a search for it, you will see that basically only this
Sputnik News article mentions this term. It is not used, or at least not in
Russia.
>why are you so keen on supporting Alina, other than "they are my friend"
Well, if helping a friend because he is a friend is not enough of a reason
for you, then I am sorry for your friends! I on my part am not indifferent to
my friends problems and I need no more of a reason to help them than
friendship.
>she SHOULD be in a jail, like **everyone** else who commits illegalities
I remind you that here you accused my friend of committing a crime without
proof. And you owe Alina and me a public apology for this and a retraction of
your words.
I do not know you do it where you live, but in Russia, people is not trialed
by linking to popular newsletters but by evidence. That is the job of an
attorney in law. We do not have enough money to pay for what they charge, and
that is why I came here to as for help.
