That's absolutely not what I said...
"They", if it's those bavarian dudes (including Goethe, awesome fellow),
planned to do rather positive things (the OPPOSITE of NWO). Plus they don't
exist anymore since a long time ago.
Frome there, "they", to you, are some supposedly real life people (or
reptilians, while we're at it...) who planned to trick us with human rights
while being assholes at the same time: Monsanto, Microsoft, damage our
rights...
Wait, first they provide rights, including the right to bring wrong things
into light, then they damage those rights?
If some sick people planned to do so, they're doing it the wrong way.
Then you say "They" lie to us, and "they" want to control all the world.
Can you be more generic and meaningless than that? I doubt it. Maybe have
some proof? Or at least reasoning that makes sense?
Removing 2/3 of humans with vaccines in schools and wars in middle easts? WTF
is wrong with you?
First, we live longer than our ancestors, vaccines or not.
Second, we have less wars than ever in human history (I think, gotta confirm
that). Still, even if having current wars going on is wrong, if you think
this would remove 2/3 of humanity, you're doing math wrong.
Death is still death, but the point is what you're saying makes no sense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_toll
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_military_conflicts
Even if what you said made sense, how being against human rights help?
Even if it's a trick, it's good stuff. As far as I know, being pro-human
rights doesn't make people be pro Monsanto, pro-war and pro Microsoft (well
the latter is more an ignorance or convenience thing).
