Looking for anyone's opinion here. Here we have an OS that's certified by the
FSF and GnuProject and it's native browser vs the FSF and GnuProject's own
browser.
So freedom-wise they should be in the exact same landscape.
But what about other areas like performance, features, design (highly
subjective, but I'm interested in people's opinions on everything - even
highly subjective matters) etc.
Me personally I think IceCat does a way better job at handing out
information/protection to potential inexperienced users in regards to the
Javascript situation. On the default front page there are checkboxes for
enabling LibreJS extension and for disabling/enabling JS as a whole.
It's been a while since I reinstalled the OS (and/or reinstalled Abrowser)
but I don't think Abrowser has any of that information by default.