So if we want to speak for free software movement, we must firmly reject such "doing no harm" non-free licenses.
When we share software, we are definitely doing "evil" to proprietary
software companies and the capitalist governments behind them. But doing
"evil" to the enemies is doing good for free software movement. The question
is, where we are doing good or evil, this question is judged by whom (and the
answer is so obvious).
- [Trisquel-users] An Open Source License That Requires Users ... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] An Open Source License That Requir... commodore256
- [Trisquel-users] Re : An Open Source License That Requi... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] An Open Source License That Requir... andyprough
- Re: [Trisquel-users] An Open Source License That Requir... softwdensky
- Re: [Trisquel-users] An Open Source License That Requir... xliang9550
- Re: [Trisquel-users] An Open Source License That Requir... commodore256
- Re: [Trisquel-users] An Open Source License That Requir... strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] An Open Source License That Requir... protonlucifer