Re: [Trisquel-users] My experience using Trisquel so far

[commodore256]

and maybe with musl too. Alpine Linux uses musl and it's pretty fast. eglibc  
hasn't been updated in 5 years, so since then debian moved to glibc. So I  
think it would be cool if Trisquel used musl, it would use less RAM and it  
would remove temptations to install non-free software like installing a Deb  
of Skype or Discord. The only problem would be I couldn't scrape pre-compiled  
debs of free packages made for distros that half-ass freedom and I hear  
getting Rust to work is a pain in the ass. Contemporary GlibC has a 8m thread  
stack size and using my system as an example I have 140 threads open so that  
would just be 1.08gigs and musl has an 80k thread stack size, so 140 threads  
would be 11megs.