On Freitag, 28. Juni 2013 14:27:34 CEST, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 28 June 2013 14:20:34 Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Freitag, 28. Juni 2013 11:50:13 CEST, Pali Rohár wrote: ...
I know, so I'm asking if I should remove constructor (and
compiler will generate one without parent qobject paremeter) or
move it to public section?
Qt usually has them public (though likely mostly for documentation reasons)
I'd suggest to just stick to that pattern.
And i discourage the inline implementation - at least long term.
(As you don't know whether you ever want to implement sth. there, and then have
fun with compilers and ABI)
Cheers,
Thomas
