*************
The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org
************
Hi Leon
if i understand your statements you are saying we must follow back our
current games to find the first game we played and were overwhelmed at and when
it is timebroken we are done. this is like Dianetics where LRH looked for the
Basic-Basic engram which when audited took the sting out of all rest of the
engrams in the case.
this sounds correct.
Keep on TROMing
Pete
>________________________________
>From: Leo Swart <leosw...@xtra.co.nz>
>To: "trom@lists.newciv.org" <trom@lists.newciv.org>
>Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 11:26 PM
>Subject: [TROM1] Reply to issue 18
>
>*************
>The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org
>************
>
>
>
>Martin posted the following TROM quote. I have highlighted or undelined some
bits:
>
>((((That which is considered important tends to persist and to become
>more solid. Solidity and persistence - need for - are thus the basic
>conviction phenomena in games. Things are made more solid and more
>persistent to convince others of their existence. The mechanism is
>entirely reversible: that which is persisting and solid is tended to be
>regarded as important.
>
>
>Any importance is relative to, and can be evaluated against,
any other
>importance. There is no absolute
importance. Thus, what the being
>considers important is relative to the being and the games he is playing.
>
>
>Thus, any field of knowledge which postulates an absolute
importance is
>at variance with natural law. ( The search for deeper significance into
>life or the mind is only the search for prior or greater importance. In
>that all importance is relative to all other importance it is both a
>fruitless and endless search. Various past researchers in this field
>have claimed to have discovered basic importances of a more or less
>absolute nature ( 'sex', 'survival', etc. ) and then proceeded to
>develop a therapy based upon their discovery. We can now see clearly
>
>why they
failed. The "button" is importance. Having
now found it
>
>we can stop looking for it. ))))
>
>
>
>
>
>Am I the only one to see a tad of a contradiction here in
these two bold portions?
>
>The underlined portion is, in my opinion the key to it. The “game”
the being is playing is essentially the first creation he sought to make known
but which was invalidated and overwhelmed. All subsequent actions have been
attempts to get that original one
admired or accepted. This is the “Basic Goal” or “Rock” in Scio terms. It
equates to Survival and Rightness. Even though he may appear to have abadoned
that original creation/goal, the truth is that he never has. He is still
pursuing
it even on the via of pursuig substitutes or whatever.
>
>Any “Importance” he assigns to anything is evaluated to be
so in terms of this original creation. Devaluing that assignment in present
time would certainly lead to big key outs etc etc and gains for the guy – I am
not negatng any of the massive potential benefits that TROM brings about - but
he for sure will never get out of the game
completely untill that original postulate/creation is accepted and admired by
the PD terminals it was directed at. These terminals are, of course, also
creations/considerations of the guy himself so I am not suggesting he needs to
go hunting for those thetans. He is them.
>
>Leon
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: "trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org" <trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org>
>To: trom@lists.newciv.org
>Sent: Sunday, 13 November 2011 6:06 PM
>Subject: Trom Digest, Vol 88, Issue 18
>
>Send Trom mailing list submissions to
> trom@lists.newciv.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> trom-ow...@lists.newciv.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Trom digest...."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Trom Digest, Vol 88, Issue 17 (jago...@tiscali.it)
> 2. Re: Trom Digest, Vol 88, Issue 17 (Aarre Peltomaa)
> 3. reply to Paul (Paul Tipon)
> 4. Re: reply to Paul (Martin Foster)
> 5. Re: reply to Martin
(Paul Tipon)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:48:02 +0100
>From: jago...@tiscali.it
>To: trom@lists.newciv.org
>Subject: Re: [TROM1] Trom Digest, Vol 88, Issue 17
>Message-ID: <0f9fb5df-5519-46f6-841a-3b9b0ca20...@tiscali.it>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed";
> DelSp="yes"
>
>Of course YES.Whatever we do inour , reflects in mass consciousness
>as well.The more Trommers the bigger the effect!
>So let's do our job.
>good work,
>alex.
>
>
>Il giorno 12/nov/11, alle ore 13:00, trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org ha
>scritto:
>
>> Even if all TROM members got to level 5 completion by Dec.
>> 21/'2012, do you
>> think that that action alone would distimulate the planet enough to
>> shift
>> into a golden age?
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
><http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20111112/941d74b3/attachment-0001.html>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 10:53:50 -0500
>From: Aarre Peltomaa <peltomaa.aa...@gmail.com>
>To: The Resolution of Mind list
<trom@lists.newciv.org>
>Subject: Re: [TROM1] Trom Digest, Vol 88, Issue 17
>Message-ID:
> <canrdadrnq7v3xzdnn0phrjs0j83mni4kzmvuxwu74ysvs15...@mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Thanks Alex from Aarre Nov. 12/'11
>
>I guess it all benefits the total planet.
>
>Your friend,
>Aarre Peltomaa,
>peltomaa.aa...@gmail.com
>(647) 202-7267
>
>On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:48 AM, <jago...@tiscali.it> wrote:
>
>> *************
>> The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org
>> ************
>>
>> Of course YES.Whatever we do inour , reflects in mass consciousness as
>> well.The more Trommers the bigger the effect!
>> So let's do our job..
>> good work,
>> alex.
>>
>>
>> Il giorno 12/nov/11, alle ore 13:00, trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> Even if all TROM members got to level 5 completion by Dec. 21/'2012, do you
>>
>> think that that action alone would distimulate the planet enough to shift
>>
>> into a golden age?
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
>> Trom mailing list
>> Trom@lists.newciv.org
>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>
>>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
><http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20111112/86348445/attachment-0001.html>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:32:25 -0800
>From: Paul Tipon <pti...@proftitleserv.com>
>To: leosw...@xtra.co.nz
>Cc: trom@lists.newciv.org
>Subject: [TROM1] reply to Paul
>Message-ID: <4811d632-7e56-4d37-829c-e1bbf9c6b...@proftitleserv.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>Leo Swart
>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:57:49 -0800
>
>>Well, yes and no to this, IMHO.
>
>>By doing what is suggested by Dennis here is really to counter one
>earlier postulate with a later one. So I don't think it is the best
>>approach to this sort of thing. It would be better to expose the
>original postulate and then recognize it for what it was.
>
>That's what TimeBreaking is, "expose the original
postulate and then
>recognize it for what is was".
>
>My take is that one is not counter postulating when one does TROM.
>Counter postulating or taking one's own or someone else's postulates
>as an overt or a motivator and then coming up with a new postulate
>based on the overt/motivator assessment is countering or
>paralleling. That is what everyone has been doing all along. It is
>getting into a games condition and keeping it there forever.
>
>What I see in using TROM is that one is evaluating a postulate on the
>basis of its significance and usefulness and deciding whether or not
>to continue using it in present time or discarding it. Let's take
>the postulate to find and have the best cave of all caves. I hope we
>have all gone beyond that (humor). So that postulate is no longer
>being used and has been replaced
by having a nice home to live in.
>It was not countered. One has a new postulate which they are now
>operating and acting with. The old postulate is just not being put
>into action in present time anymore.
>
>This is the beauty of TimeBreaking. One compares an old (then) scene
>with a new scene and the necessity of continuing to employ the old
>postulate for that old scene in present time is seen for the
>irrationality that it is for 'now'. So it just isn't employed
>anymore. What has happened is that the old postulate is now
>relegated to memory and no longer held as a MUST in the mind just
>because one sees a mountain or what they may perceive as a beautiful
>cave women or whatever that stimulator to action is.
>
>In other words, the postulate still remains ..... 'I remember fighting
>over having the best cave' ...
but it is no longer an action one
>takes up for those caveman actions have been removed from the mind as
>an involuntary reason to take specific action when one perceives
>certain specific re-stimulators.
>
>This is the reason one needs to be a CCH completion to do TROM. One
>needs to be in PT, in command of things in PT and not the involuntary
>effect of fighting battles from ages ago. Then one can pull up those
>things that have involuntary command over one, TimeBreak them and
>go .... 'Oh my God, I was doing that so that I would have dinosaur
>soup for tonight'. Actually you may not get that kind of a re-action
>for an old postulate. You may just get .... Ho Hum, yawn (no
>involuntary reaction from whatever that was anymore, I ain't there no
>more and probably never will be there again (useless old postulate)).
>
>As a
reference, the cycle is .... consideration-postulate-ARC. If
>one never takes the postulate to ARC, they are not employing it and
>putting it into action and it just sits there, wherever (just a
>memory). ARC is also another description for something/anything in
>the MEST Universe and therefore what the MEST Universe is comprised
>of. That's one of the secrets to postulates, they can just sit there
>and do nothing. I'm sure everyone here has more than once
>experienced the ... how come that didn't vanish, I put a postulate
>there, my postulates don't work ... ?????????
>
>With TROM one is on the path to knowing how to make postulates work.
>More so than Scn.
>
>Paul
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:35:26 +0200
>From: Martin Foster <msfos...@mweb.co.za>
>To: The Resolution of Mind list <trom@lists.newciv.org>
>Subject: Re: [TROM1] reply to Paul
>Message-ID: <4ebeca7e..2080...@mweb.co.za>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>
>Hi Leon,
>
>What's keeping the mass in place is the degree of "importance"
>attributed to that mass. What one needs to ascertain is not so much the
>prior postulate but the degree of "importance" one attached to it.
>
>The consideration that the underlying, past postulate must be addressed
>will lead to the "long night of the soul" which is what Dennis suggests
>Hubbard did in his Reminiscences of Ron.
>
>TROM quote:
>((((That which is considered important tends to
persist and to become
>more solid. Solidity and persistence - need for - are thus the basic
>conviction phenomena in games. Things are made more solid and more
>persistent to convince others of their existence. The mechanism is
>entirely reversible: that which is persisting and solid is tended to be
>regarded as important.
>Any importance is relative to, and can be evaluated against, any other
>importance. There is no absolute importance. Thus, what the being
>considers important is relative to the being and the games he is playing.
>Thus, any field of knowledge which postulates an absolute importance is
>at variance with natural law. ( The search for deeper significance into
>life or the mind is only the search for prior or greater importance. In
>that all importance is relative to all other importance it is both a
>fruitless and endless search. Various past researchers in this field
>have claimed to have
discovered basic importances of a more or less
>absolute nature ( 'sex', 'survival', etc. ) and then proceeded to
>develop a therapy based
>upon their discovery. We can now see clearly why they failed. The
>"button" is importance. Having now found it we can stop looking for it. ))))
>
>Martin
>
>On 12/Nov/2011 05:57, Leo Swart wrote:
>> Well, yes and no to this, IMHO.
>>
>> I'm sure Dennis is right in so far as the mass will destimulate to a
>> great degree, but bear in mind that what is keeping such a mass in
>> place is not merely the idea that one needs to regard it as being
>> "trivial". The entire thrust of Hubbard's approach on this is that
>> the mass is held in place by an underlying postulate which is very
>> specific to the time and place of the incident and also to the goals
>> of the person involved.
>>
>> By doing what is suggested by Dennis here is really
to counter one
>> earlier postulate with a later one. So I don't think it is the best
>> approach to this sort of thing. It would be better to expose the
>> original postulate and then recognise it for what it was.
>>
>>
>> cheers
>>
>>
>> Leon
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:40:56 -0800
>> From: Paul Tipon <pti...@proftitleserv.com
>> <mailto:pti...@proftitleserv.com>>
>> Subject: [TROM1] I mentioned earlier how important Relative
>> Importances are
>> To: trom@lists.newciv.org <mailto:trom@lists.newciv.org>
>> Message-ID: <e045794f-10fd-4906-9588-e5ba1519f...@proftitleserv.com
>> <mailto:e045794f-10fd-4906-9588-e5ba1519f...@proftitleserv.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>>
>> Well, in prepping for doing Level 5 by reading and re-reading over
>> and over again, I came across this truth by Dennis.
>>
>> "The entire secret of making any mental mass vanish is to re-evaluate
>> its importance
to present time realities to the point where it is
>> considered so trivial that there is no longer any need to keep it in
>> existence; at which moment the mass can be easily not-known and will
>> promptly vanish. [On the other hand, ]While the mass is considered
>> important, it will continue in existence and the being will continue
>> to know it - even though trying desperately to not-know it.
>>
>> To try and vanish by means of force a mass while still holding the
>> consideration that it is important is thus the height of stupidity
>> and can only lead to frustration and failure.
>>
>> Thus we see that the re-evaluation of past importances is the only
>> step required to achieve the vanishment of any mental mass. As a
>> successful psychotherapy can be defined as a system that brings about
>> the vanishment of unwanted mental conditions, we see that this data
>>
is vital to our goal.
>>
>> The ability to assign and un-assign importances, while native to the
>> being, will be found to require some attention on the route out."
>>
>> For ease of reading I have interjected the phrase found in brackets,
>> i.e. [...].
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Trom mailing list
>> Trom@lists.newciv.org <mailto:Trom@lists.newciv.org>
>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>
>>
>> End of Trom Digest, Vol 88, Issue 14
>> ************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
>> Trom mailing list
>> Trom@lists.newciv.org
>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 9.0.920 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4011 - Release Date: 11/11/11
>> 21:34:00
>>
>>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
><http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20111112/39065929/attachment-0001.html>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:06:05
-0800
>From: Paul Tipon <pti...@proftitleserv.com>
>To: msfos...@mweb.co.za
>Cc: trom@lists.newciv.org
>Subject: Re: [TROM1] reply to Martin
>Message-ID: <89843ba0-fe25-4716-a3ae-6be9a61ec...@proftitleserv.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
>From Dennis as in your email:
>
>Various past researchers in this field have claimed to have
>discovered basic importances of a more or less absolute nature
>( 'sex', 'survival', etc. ) and then proceeded to develop a therapy
>based upon their discovery. We can now see clearly why they failed.
>The "button" is importance. Having now found it we can stop looking
>for it.
>
>Excellent choice. Your whole quote from Dennis is perfect.
>For everyone's reference, here is your post: http://www.mail-
>archive.com/trom@lists.newciv.org/msg01780.html
>
>Paul
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Trom mailing list
>Trom@lists.newciv.org
>http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>
>
>End of Trom Digest, Vol 88, Issue
18
>************************************
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Trom mailing list
>Trom@lists.newciv.org
>http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
Trom@lists.newciv.org
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
