************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************
Svoboda, your statement almost sounds like you are saying similar to LRH's, "the greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics."
I came across this statement from Dennis: Thus complementary postulates, when applied, have the ability to dissolve all games. He also says all overwhelms are overt acts: Overwhelming the postulate of an opponent in a game is known as an overt act. Only to the degree of letting go of compulsive games and fixed importances do I enjoy the freedom of choice of how to respond to or initiate a game. That is why coming up the scale of ethics feels good and sometimes people want to stop their clearing work and enjoy their improved abilities to play more fun games. Since doing Scientology's Grade 2 I am feeling more complementary and having more fun with others. Meaning, less into forcing and preventing others. Hubbard used the phrase, "the game of life" and Hubbard's ethics works in the playing of games -- has a workability, meaning the scaling of conditions and their formulas. This keeps the game more expansive and less serious which is the best compulsive humans (i.e., beings identified with bodies) can want for. However, someone going beyond human identification, like Paul T., or Alberto S. and others, having removed many, if not all compulsions to game with others, being complementary -- for Level 5 completions -- I would imagine would be quite natural. A native state. Keep on Trommin' Colleen
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
