Michael D: Glenn and Izzy, I have a question? If it is not in the Bible gives one the opportunity to decide whether to or not to, yes. But should there not be other criteria in deciding what to do in those situations? For instance, does it bring spiritual edification and does it fit in with sound biblical principle? A good example is the practice of ...pleading the blood of Jesus... Personally, I can't find any ground for doing that in the scripture, so I don't do it.
My feeling is that it is of limited, if any use at all. What I understand the scripture to be saying is that the blood of Jesus has given us certain rights and priviledges, and absolute authority against the enemy. Using the authority and enforcing those rights and priviledges are the way I see the scripture teaching us to appropriate the value of the blood of Jesus, but just pleading the blood doesn't seem to be accurate... What do you all think?
ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Glenn, I think you are right on in this statement. Izzy
I believe if it's not in the Bible then I am free to do it or not do it.
Get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs.
