> > DAVEH: I gave my simplified definition for 'damnation' so it would be
> > easy for TTers to understand how I perceive it. (I do not necessarily
> > expect you to accept my definition though.) Let me ask you two (Kevin
> > and Perry, or anybody else who wishes to comment) what Jesus meant in
> > Mt 23:14 when he said......
> >
> > "But woe unto you........therefore ye shall receive the greater
> > damnation."
> >
> > ........Do you view 'damnation' in various degrees as this might
> > suggest?
There may be varying degrees of punishment in Hell, but Hell is still Hell.
Now, you have tried to derail our conversation about the fact that the non-polygamous LDS are damned, lets get back to the main point. So, from our discussion on "damned", and the fact that you have conveniently redefined "damned" to mean "impedance of eternal progression", I guess you essentially admit that you are "damned" by the LDS god's staement via JS the prophet, as is every other LDS not practicing polygamy, but that "damned" is not a bad thing.
Perry
Check your PC for viruses with the FREE McAfee online computer scan. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
