Perhaps I should have contacted you privately, and I apologize for using your particular exchange with Izzy as a public example. (You two are not alone; many of us have used TT to post personal comments from time to time.) But, I think it served the group well in that really clarified to all members what I was trying to get across.

Perry the Moderate

From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the real vs false
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 05:18:11 -0400

PTM:Maybe you should have contacted US privately. It only went from private
to public when I did not hear back.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 12, 2004 00:30
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] the real vs false


> Sorry for choosing this email as an example...but here goes...
>
> Lance and Izzy seem to be conducting personal business on TT. As soon as
the
> topic became an issue ONLY between Izzy and Lance, it should have been
taken
> to personal email. I could care less about your book exchange, and prefer
> not to waste time by wading through several exchanges of the supposed
thread
> "real vs false" only to hear all about the book...I sent it...I didn't get
> it...do you want it...yes I want it...I'll order it....oh my!.
>
> Do you get the point?
>
> Perry the Moderate
>
> >From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] the real vs false
> >Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:13:26 -0500
> >
> >Oh, yes, I would like to order it from your bookstore if you like.
Somehow
> >I
> >didn't receive your personal reply-oh my. Izzy
> >
> > _____
> >
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
> >Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 7:12 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the real vs false
> >
> >Izzy:Sent you a personal reply re: the book you asked about. Did you
> >receive
> >it? Do you want it?
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: ShieldsFamily <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: June 11, 2004 09:09
> >Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] the real vs false
> >
> >Lance, Did I miss the original question? Izzy
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
> >Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 3:45 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the real vs false
> >
> >Izzy: Yes/No (book)? Lance
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: ShieldsFamily <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: June 10, 2004 19:08
> >Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] the real vs false
> >
> >The dogs were never a match for the Cat. :-)
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
> >Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 3:46 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] the real vs false
> >
> >Good day Izzy,
> >
> >I shall call off the dogs. I may even climb down from my high horse
> >demanding apologies from anyone that moves. My attempts at convicting
> >others of sin have always been failures; perhaps the Holy Spirit really
is
> >better at it. Sigh, unemployed again!
> >
> >After saying lets agree to disagree you make one final poke; enjoy it.
If
> >I
> >was a big man I would not poke back.
> >
> >Must...
> >
> >Stop...
> >
> >Typing...
> >
> >
> >To reconciliation from our Lord Jesus Christ,
> >
> >Jonathan
> >
> > _____
> >
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
> >Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:20 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] the real vs false
> >
> >Jonathan, I think there is little point in belaboring this discussion any
> >further. I am "extreme" about everything I believe in, and see that as a
> >result of my "extreme" commitment to God. I am not lukewarm about
> >anything.
> >Let's just agree to disagree. You'll have to malign America and President
> >Bush to someone else who will agree with you, like G. Izzy
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
> >I feel that your extreme pro-American stance (with takes the religiosity
of
> >Christianity and mixes it with patriotism) is an unchristian stance, one
> >that works against your faith.
> >
> >Jonathan
> >
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought 
to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to