RE: [TruthTalk] Re:The Faith of Jesus Christ-Gal 3:1-4:11

[ShieldsFamily]

Jt, I knew that.  Exactly.  But you can’t get the man to admit it.  (He thinks he’s talking over our heads.) Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 7:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The Faith of Jesus Christ-Gal 3:1-4:11   Izzy what I hear him saying is that there is no "objective truth" everything is relative ie "relative to your existing framework of thought" So we all have our own "truth" and so we must adjust to everyone's individual frameworks - and  "psychobabble" is an excellent descriptive word for it...  jt   On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:06:20 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Iz:Brother John wrote a couple of excellent posts upon return from his 'holiday' weekend. Why not focus on those? No 'psychobabble' there.   You can only speak from within your existing framework of thought. Me too. So, just think on 'the epistemological relevance of the homoousion' as that is what this is all about.   From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 07, 2004 08:55 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:The Faith of Jesus Christ-Gal 3:1-4:11   Lance, Explanation. You never provide one.  Typical psychobabble: impossible to “apprehend”.  No wonder you and g get along so well. Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 5:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The Faith of Jesus Christ-Gal 3:1-4:11   Iz:Participation. Read Gal 3:1-4:11. ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 07, 2004 06:54 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:The Faith of Jesus Christ-Gal 3:1-4:11   Lance, what are you saying below?  I find your language impossible to decipher at times.  What does “encompasses” mean? Are you saying you wonder how we can learn faithfulness from Jesus? Or are you saying you are wondering how Jesus has “inputed” his faithfulness to us (meaning we just have to think we are to be?) Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir I think so, yes. Honestly, I'm still sorting out how the former (faithfulness of Jesus) encompasses the latter (our participation).