RE: [TruthTalk] The Schizophrenic God

[Slade Henson]

I need your address because we were going to snail mail you Slade's book on the Deity. It's my fault, Lance....I threw your address out. I can get you the book in the mail today if I get your address...   Kay -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, 27 November, 2004 09.39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Schizophrenic God What do you know that underlies your saying 'how the ANALYTICAL WESTERN MIND came up with an accepted (the) trinity'?    I should like to hear (read) you expand upon 'YHVH is not a Trinity and nor is he NOT a Trinity' ----- Original Message ----- From: Slade Henson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 27, 2004 09:16 Subject: RE: Re: [TruthTalk] The Schizophrenic God Scripture does have its paradoxes, Dave, no matter how small and no matter how "easily" explained they are (i.e. a simple one: a loving God who is wrathful). The Hebrew mindset easily accepts the dichotomies while the analytical mindset must explain them away. As you brought up in an earlier post, the Trinity is a perfect example. Since Christians have created such importance upon the acceptance of the Trinity and they have made it a dogmatic doctrine, they feel the need to explain "it." Once they begin to try to explain what it unexplainable, they [mostly] fall into heresy.   For me, YHVH is not a Trinity and nor is He NOT a Trinity. I see the Trinitarian concept merely a way to try to understand the Hand of God in our/the world's life. He is far FAR greater than the Trinitarian model.   What I find amazing is how the analytical western mind came up with an accepted the Trinity.   -- slade -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave Hansen Sent: Saturday, 27 November, 2004 02.06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Schizophrenic God    DAVEH:  Do you find it easy to explain, Izzy?  It seems to me that Christians don't have easy explanations, hence they label it as a paradox.