interestg comment,
but no
simply, Slade, on
the front burner here is how to get along better--it's possible, and, i suspect
we'd tend to agree more, conversely disagree/argue less, with more emphasis on
accurate analysis of texts such as Gen 15, which is one source of
legitimate disagreement in the 'vacuum' (postd bible study per
se lackg)
e.g., wouldn't you
and (e.g) Terry agree to agree on an accurate conclusion from the exegesis of
Gen 15? e.g., are your hybrid presuppositions totally
non-negotiable--why not integrate some othr hybrid thinkg? (nobodies presupps
are pure are they?)
anyway, it's easier
and more pleasant to argue about that kinda stuff than it is to
argue at, agnst each othr, partic whr ppl post conclusions
like 'look at lifetime tile roof' while their bamboo
walls're swayin' in twistrs of exegetical myth
:)
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 05:35:02 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
This is a little open ended, don't you think?||
