On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:37:50 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
To the contrary, Judy, at the time
of your judgment you did know of his background and that he had died. You
may not have intended it as such, but your judgment of
him, in the context of how it was made, did very much
come across as an assessment of his eternal destiny. You even admit that
in a private correspondence between us. That conversation is also in the
archives because you mistakenly posted it on TT.
jt: I would be interested in seeing what the publicly
posted private correspondence says Bill so if you wouldn't mind could you
send me those dates. However, I think you are reading your
understanding into what I said because I just don't think along the lines of
saved, lost, saved, lost, in my own life and I most certainly am not assessing
others constantly to the point of damning them to hell (your words). I
think you must have a good imagination and I wonder why you do so
much accusing. judyt
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs Book o... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs B... Bill Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs B... Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs B... ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs B... ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs B... ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lam... Debbie Sawczak
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the... Bill Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in... Debbie Sawczak
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Writt... Bill Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are W... Debbie Sawczak