Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean anything

[Jeff Powers]

How about as Torah obedient as one can possibly be in 5765.  I know I sin and I admit it,

 just like nearly everyone else here.

Yet for most reading this thread, your answer (see below) places you above everyone else. I am

 sure I'm not the only one who reads your answer to be that you claim to be sinless.

However, you tap-danced around John's direct question in a manner that allows you to answer

with a non-answer.

Lance wrote:
> IFF David is 'one of us' then, he consciously,
> actively, sins daily in thought, word and deed.

Then I guess I am not one of you.

Peace be with you.
David Miller.

Then you answer me with an attitude of superiority (I may be wrong but thats how I

 read your answer) as if everyone but you "conciously, actively, sin..."  Then ask me

to define sin?

Jeff

 

Life makes warriors of us all.
To emerge the victors, we must arm
ourselves with the most potent of weapons.
That weapon is prayer.
--Rebbe Nachman of Breslov

----- Original Message -----

From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>

Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 18:40

Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean anything

> Jeff wrote:
>> Does that mean that you David Miller are sinless?
>
> No.  It means that I do not consciously, actively, sin daily in thought,
> word and deed.
>
> On second thought, define sinless.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.