The RCC believe it was their idea and they teach that the Bible is the fruit of their structure - so therefore has less
authority than their Magisterium and the "Church Fathers" have equal footing.  Am I hearing you say the same JD?
 
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 00:49:44 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 2/5/2005 9:18:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If inspiration means anything at all, it has application only as the Spirit works in our lives through (in part) the reading of the comparative text.  
Right, The Holy Spirit can only work through the differing Greek Texts and a bunch of fat old men that Collate them!
Apparently you actually do not read.   in an earlier post, I had assumed otherwise.   I said " ....(in part) ....'  and Kevin thinks this means "can only work through."   Where do you think your Bible came from, Kevin?   K-Mart?   Here is a news flash  --  it's present day form was the idea of the early church  (300-400 AD).  Some believe this process to be providential.  Your English translation came from the very men you criticize.  That the Spirit in inspires our studied opinions is something that is beyond doubt except from the cultish right.  You needing help to understand scripture?   That is not the problem as I see it.   You actually need help remembering to take your medication   (ADD is problem  ???). 

 

Reply via email to