Bill wrote: > ... he said that he was also speaking of > people who have those tendencies but > are not acting on them.
Bill, that is a cop-out of the perverts. Their agenda is to claim that their civil rights are being violated by not allowing them free reign and protection for their lustful perversions. Please agree with me that a homosexual who has only had tendencies but has not acted upon them is NOT a homosexual. Would you consider a man who has experienced promiscuous tendencies but has never acted upon them a fornicator? Nevertheless, I also will point out that 1 Cor. 6:9 condemns the effeminate right along with adulterers and homosexuals. Would you consider the effeminate to be perverts? Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
