JD/Perry what about the fact that some (possibly
including Gary) hold to a doctrine that teaches them that the
spiritual gifts Jesus gave to the Church are not for
today - that they died out with the last apostle - as senseless
as that may be. A person like that would not
accept a genuine prophet in their midst, nor would they be
qualified to evaluate the gift operating through them
which would make their opinion on the subject without
foundation and pointless. jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:12:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You know , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported.JD
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gary, To call someone's comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.
Perry the moderator
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative
>personal reasons or as does the author, below)
>
>On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>writes:
> >..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
