Sorry, Lance, I took your question to be rhetorical since 'foolishness' was
in quotes. So, here is your answer. I consider questions 1, 2, and 4 to be
serious questions that Blaine can answer, and questions for which I expected
(or at least hoped for) an answer. Question 3 I consider to be an extremely
serious question, which I expected Blaine to ignore.
As far as asking him to answer my questions before I answer his, he is
generally good at answering questions when they come one or two at a time,
but if there are more than a couple he tends to ignore the questions, then
fires back his own. I am not going to play that way. I want some semblance
of a discussion, so I am going to force that issue.
Perry
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:02:18 -0400
Now, CPL, how 'bout answering me?
.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Sent: June 06, 2005 13:59
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
> Blaine, I did not make that comment. It is from Lance. While most of use
> place our OWN name before a statement we make, Lance places the name of
the
> person he is addresseing before his comment. I guess that is the way it
is
> done in Canada :-)
>
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
> >To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
> >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
> >Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:32:59 EDT
> >
> >
> >Interesting comment, CPL. :>)
> >Blaine
> >
> >In a message dated 6/6/2005 11:06:26 AM Mountain Standard Time,
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >CPL:You actually expect Blaine to take this 'foolishness' seriously?
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
> >Sent: June 06, 2005 12:56
> >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
> >
> >
> > > Blaine, in your usual style, you have not answered my questions,
yet
> >expect
> > > me to answer yours. Let me list them out for you...after you answer
> >them,
> > > then list yours out and I will take a stab at answering them:
> > >
> > > 1. Is your "witness of the spirit" that subjective heartburn
feelings
> > > mormons say they get? AKA, the burning in the bazoom?
> > >
> > > 2. Do you have any biblical references that this burning feeling
is
a
> >valid
> > > witness?
> > >
> > > 3. Could it instead possibly be the fires of hell being stoked by
your
> > > resident demon?
> > >
> > > 4. Have you ever seen the Sheikinah yourself?
> > >
> > > Perry
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
