Your god is a pipsqueak not capable of preserving his word!
I suspect he is not capable of anything.
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope! Even with God in the equation, imperfection (humanism if you like, though I prefer humanity) is still the outcome.----- Original Message -----From: Kevin DeeganSent: June 21, 2005 07:44Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] BeliefMy point exactly (see previous post)YOU LEAVE God OUT of the EQUATION.Granted that 'Pontificating' is both easier and, more fun, I'll stick my nose in just a touch (discuss). The Scriptures first appeared written in the languages spoken by those to whom they were given. (non-controversial!) Thereafter they were translated by men (mostly but, women participate in the activity now) into other than the original languages (also non-controversial). In the very activity of translating, these men/women invest part of themselves into the translations. (I'd say non-controversial here also) Outcome? Imperfection!From: Kevin DeeganSent: June 21, 2005 07:25Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] BeliefWould you like to discuss such or just Pontificate?
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Herein you sound like a Mormon, Kevin. Belief overrides understanding. That's OK as everyone does this from time to time.----- Original Message -----From: Kevin DeeganSent: June 21, 2005 07:16Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] BeliefYou misunderstand?It is not a work of men but a work of GodKevin's meaning?1. 'I do not see it as... Therefore it might be imperfectly translated2. 'I see it as ...It is sufficiently representative of that which is necessary for 'salvation'.3. It ain't perfect but, it is sufficient. Therefore, so are most, if not all, other translations.It's a far cry from what you've said in the past. It's a step in the right direction, Kevin.----- Original Message -----From: Kevin DeeganSent: June 21, 2005 06:53Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] BeliefI do not see it as "perfectly translated" (by men)I see it as God's word (transmitted & preserved by Him)DAVEH: Which version do you consider, perfectly translated, Kevin?
Kevin Deegan wrote:I hold the PERFECT Word of God in my hands. NO ERRORS.
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:DAVEH: Ahhhhhhh.....thanx for clearing the cobwebs, Lance!
Was there not just recently a big discussion on TT about the accuracy of some of the Bible translations. There was a little concern about the JW green Bible. And in previous years we've discussed how the NIV version dropped a few passages that are found in the KJV. Just why do we have so many versions of the Bible, if someone didn't think there was a problem with the existing versions? Surely they can't all be translated correctly.....do you disagree?
Furthermore, when two Christians determine doctrines differently from the same source, does that not cause one to ponder why? Could it be the translations are not adequately conveying what God wants understood? I don't view that as being a weakness of God , but rather a weakness of the translation. Is that a reasonable stance?
So Lance, I would ask you (or any TTer) if you believe any particular translation of the Bible is 100% accurate. If the answer is yes, may I assume you would then also believe that the other translations are less than 100% accurate? Now, if the answer is you do not believe a particular translation is 100% accurate, then would you take my position and accept the Bible to be the word of God as far as it it translated correctly?
I would sure be interested to know if any TTers really do believe a given translation is 100% accurate. And if you fear reprisal from other TTers for whatever comments you might have, post it to me off-Forum. As you know, I will not mock or denigrate your comments....I'm sincerely interested in knowing your beliefs.
Lance Muir wrote:Enlarge upon "as far as it is translated correctly".-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Yahoo! Sports
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football