Re: [TruthTalk] On knowing the Father through the Son by the Spirit

[knpraise]

Sorry.   Back to the original subject  ..............  which I believe was the work of insulting Lance or was it Gary?   I forget. 

 

Jd 

 
-----Original Message-----
From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:50:15 -0500
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] On knowing the Father through the Son by the Spirit

JD, why can?t you just get over it whenever someone sleights you in some manner? You have such a huge ego problem IMO.  (I?m taking really HUGE?you will probably rehearse this for weeks or months!) No one else on TT does this except you.  My advice: get back to the original subject or forget it; we?re tired of it already. iz

 

---

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 8:02 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On knowing the Father through the Son by the Spirit

 

My own kids have said  "you are  such a poop, Dad" after my telling them that we are not going to do sucha dn such.   What I INTENDED is what I said.   The rest of you enlightened Holy-Ghost-gave-me-the =truth=about-you  folks, not withstanding.   I know what I intended  ......  you do not.  

 

 

ad hom on this forum is a joke.   The right has no clue and virtually never backs off an ad hom.  The left knows exactly then they are being ad hom and usually do "repent."  

 

Daivd can give three choices  --  uneducated, dishonest or "just plain stupid" and then (falsely) claim that this is not ad hom.  And why does he not narrow the three choices?   Why didn't he?  God back and read of his logic.   BECAUSE TO DO SO WOULD VIOLATE THE AD HOM RULE ON THIS FORUM.  David is an avowed legalist.   As a result, he believes he can construct insults in such a way as to not go over the line, technically speaking...........................when it is abundantly clear what he really meant.   He didn't narrow it down because he didn't need.   He believes all three about me. 

 

Whatever. 

 

JD 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Clifton <wabbits1234@earthlink.net>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 07:17:27 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On knowing the Father through the Son by the Spirit

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

"poop" in the context of my post meant "stick in the mud."  

 

JD 

==================================================================================

Totally unacceptable explanation.  Poop and mud have entirely different characteristics.  Mud is a mixture of soil and water.  Poop can be a mixture of many things.  Poop, of course, can turn to soil over time, but not necessarily to mud.

Please come up with a different explanation, or you will be known as a glorbflad who ad homs.
Thank you in advance.
Terry