Oh yeah well I post the whole Internet Start at the root servers.... Don't you have any ideas of your own?
You AVOID THE SUBJECT: Why don't you answer any of the following before running off in a new direction (one of which we have visted before and you have been shown to be misleadind AGAIN. What a shocker!) You hope to run down another BUNNY TRAIL to AVOID ANSWERING: 1) The corrupt Nature of Aleph & B and many of the Critical texts 2) The HONESTY of NIDA, the Next Pope and others on the Nestle/Aland greek text committe 3) Why over 90% of ALL GREEK Texts are of the superior quality & internal agreement of the MAJORITY TEXT versus the vast disagreement amongst themselves even in the "oldest & best" Aleph & B 2000 disagreements in the gospels alone! 4) Why the NASV John 1:18 teaches a God who is reavealed by a second ONLY BEGGOTTEN God 5) Why does the NASV match the HERETICAL JW New World translation 6) Why should God use Heretics like Wescott & Hort to restore the True Text of the Bible 7) Why didn't Jesus know to quote dut 8 in the NASV Luke 4:4 "every word of God" 8) Why the majority text appears thruout all ages, from ALL areas of the known world and is in the Majority and is in agreement 9) why the Majority text does not show the signs nor the corruption of the Critical text 10) Why the overwhelming majority of Church fathers quoting scripture in their writings AGREE with the Majority Text 11) Why the creeds AGREE with the majority text 12) Where was the Critical text before Wescott & Hort and the RV Should I continue? (more ISSUES you have AVOIDED on request) I think you missed a point or two! Your NEWEST BUNNY TRAILS You have not shown anything in the way of EVIDENCE (what a surprise!) as far as Erasmus Yet we see that there is unmistakenly a possible Future POPE on the Nestle/Aland greek text committee. Hypocrisy abounds with you JD. Apocryhpha, Another straw man JD! FACTS The Apochryphal books are interspersed in Codex Aleph & B Not so the KJV Apocryphal books are not part of the Textus receptus As shown they are an integral part of the "oldest & best" AND the TWO BIGGEST CORRUPTIONS are your beloved Aleph & B the easily shown tampered manuscripts which form the BASIS for ALL New Versions! --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://www.bibletexts.com/kjv-tr.htm > > The above will give an opposing opinion to Kevin's thinking. > > Know this - that the KJV in its original state included the > Apocrypha - which remains in the RCC bible. The primary text of > the KJV was created by a Roman Catholic named Erasmus and much of his > work was based on the Latin Vulgate and NOT on a critical review of > the Greek text of the day. > > Textual criticism is extremely important because of the variations > that Kevin, in part, refers to. That the KJ text (textus receptus) > is in some agreement with the versions of the day (i.e. Vulgate) is > of no surprise since Erasmus used these versions to create his greek > text -- and did it in record time -- about 20 weeks of work went > into the text that was the basis for the KJV. > > Anyway - corruption of the greek text abounds and the need for > scholarly review is well established. > > Enough said. > > JD > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org > Sent: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:51:16 -0500 > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor > > > All of this is from the web, written by KJVonlyists - a little > known and small wing of the Christian movement that believes the KJV > ------------ the translation itself -- is inspired. They reject > textual criticism or textual comparisons, believing, instead, that > the succession of biblical evidence came to an end with the last > original documents of scripture (perhaps John's writing of > Revelations) . The King James VERSION of the Bible IS THE WORD OF > GOD for modern man -- that is the cry of these cultists. > > They refuse to answer question about how the KJV came into being > because such answers put them in a box from which there is no > escape. They insist on moral standards that deny God's ability to > work through profane men to accomplish His purposes. They make fun > of those who ask questions about verbal/plenary inspiration when, in > point of fact, they deny such occasion themselves. They neither > understand or recognize God as a providential provider. And many if > not most, deny the eternal Sonship of Christ. > > Linda -- you are not going to believe anything I might say -- so > my advice to you is to talk to two or three pastor friends of yours. > Very few -- extremely few by comparison -- Christians believe > in this cultish notion. And most pastors accept at least the NASV. > I study from the NASV. I memorize from the NKJV. My devotional > times are often spent in the New Living Bible. > > If you decide to limit yourself to the KJV -- well, it is truly a > grand translation - just not the only really good translation. > But talk to your pastors about that. > > John > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
