Phase 1 create problem
Phase 2 create solution
Phase 1 look at all the different understandings of scripture!
Phase 2 Mormon "we have a Prophet"
Phase 2 RCC "we have a Prophet/POPE"
Phase 2 Scholar "we have a Degree and understand the context and culture. We speak & read the Original languages"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You glibbly misuse this scripture while, at the same time, consistently ignoring the problem that "infallible understanding" brings into the discussion. You Judy, believe that both the bible and your reading of the text are inspired - they cannot be wrong. The problem with this assertion is manifold: it does not allow for change of opinion on a given scripture because there is no opinion on scripture; it places your understanding above all others (Miller, deegan, Linda Shileds and even Barth) when there is a disagreement of meaning or terms; it provides no reason for reconsidering a scripture; and it actually renders verbal/plenary inspiration of the text (something you believe) as unnecessary in view of the fact that God pro vides not only the words but your understanding of the text; it ignores the fact that there was no bible when Paul wrote I Co -- only Jewish scripture and the church did not have ready access to most of those document copies.jd
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor <jandgtaylor1@juno.com>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:40:02 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific imagination?
And I will simply say once more that the Word of God needs no "INTERPRETATION" and that this is the crux ofthe problem. Scripture can only be spiritually discerned. (1 Cor 2:14) so all of your theological "interpreters"will in the last day prove to have been false prophets/teachers.On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:31:06 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:There most assuredly is. David Miller, Bill Taylor and John Smithson however, have demonstrated on numerous occasions, that it is NOT ALWAYS YOURS! To ward off yet another charge of blasphemy by David, I'll simply say that ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SCRIPTURE ARE NEITHER EXHAUSTIVE NOR INFALLIBLE. That then, would include your interpretation(s) of Scripture would it not?----- Original Message -----From: Judy TaylorSent: December 05, 2005 07:21Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific imagination?Meaning that everyone has their own Jesus and there is no standard of Truth?On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:16:42 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:The definitive answer to your query concerning 'your own Jesus' is...well...YES.
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
__________________________________________________
Do You
Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com