Re: [TruthTalk] books we MUST read???

[knpraise]

When you take time to mention that you found the book "revolting,"  I assume you have read the thing.   My criticism still stands.    I did a perusal of the book when I first opened.  That first glance gave me a very different view of the book than when I actually read it........very different.   But since your perusal is apparently as thorough as my reading,  how could you possibly be wrong. 

 

jd

 

 

 

 

 

 
-----Original Message-----
From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:57:52 -0600
Subject: [TruthTalk] books we MUST read???

JD, when I tried to respond to your email it crashed my computer.  So I?m reposting on a different email from what you sent me.  Our computers definitely have bad blood for each other!

 

So according to your theory, if I peruse a book and find it to be unappealing or uninteresting then I MUST read it, just to be sure!  When, then, do I get to read the books I WANT to read jd???? I don?t have eternity in this life! iz

 

 

 

 Linda,  if you posted to me under this heading, a few minutes agp,   I can't open it.   It has that little paper clip thing.    

 

jd

 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:02:43 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]

 THE POINT OF MY POST IS  you found the book "revolting" when, in fact, you had not read the book.  Now, had you read the book , your opinion might have been the same.  You have said nothing that argues this point. 

 

jd