RE: [TruthTalk] books we MUST read???

[ShieldsFamily]

Look, Mr. Nastyman, I only said it “seemed revolting to me, so I didn’t read it.”  OKAY????  Is there some requirement in my life that I should have read a book that you thought was worthwhile or what??????????????????????? Criticize all you want.  You are quite practiced at it.  At least you aren’t alone.  The Slicer-Dicer continues…………iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 1:59 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] books we MUST read???   When you take time to mention that you found the book "revolting,"  I assume you have read the thing.   My criticism still stands.    I did a perusal of the book when I first opened.  That first glance gave me a very different view of the book than when I actually read it........very different.   But since your perusal is apparently as thorough as my reading,  how could you possibly be wrong.    jd             -----Original Message----- From: ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:57:52 -0600 Subject: [TruthTalk] books we MUST read??? JD, when I tried to respond to your email it crashed my computer.  So I?m reposting on a different email from what you sent me.  Our computers definitely have bad blood for each other!   So according to your theory, if I peruse a book and find it to be unappealing or uninteresting then I MUST read it, just to be sure!  When, then, do I get to read the books I WANT to read jd???? I don?t have eternity in this life! iz        Linda,  if you posted to me under this heading, a few minutes agp,   I can't open it.   It has that little paper clip thing.       jd   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:02:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]  THE POINT OF MY POST IS  you found the book "revolting" when, in fact, you had not read the book.  Now, had you read the book , your opinion might have been the same.  You have said nothing that argues this point.    jd