Debbie wrote:
She is neither
learning nor teaching here but is doubtless fruitful elsewhere.
You
do not speak for all, Debbie. And I take offense at your comments here. I
learn very much from Judy's posts. I cannot speak for Judy, but I believe
she is learning much from her pressence here--I know I do--as TT is a great
forum to hear new ideas.
Debbie wrote:
She should not be participating in such a forum at all.
I
suspect that such a sentiment is not Judy's problem, but your own. The aim
of communication and debate does not have to be agreement. TT is a place to
air out ideas. Just because one member of TT isn't as responsive as you
would like her to be does not make her ideas unvalid. Your statement was
condescending and closed-minded.
-Christine
Lance
Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----
Original Message -----
Sent: January 08, 2006 08:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God
(Judy)
You see? She sometimes does believe in the
deity of Christ. She goes down a trail of disagreeing with somebody
because of who it is or some shibboleth they have used, instead of
thinking properly about what they are saying, and then finds,
surprise surprise, she is contradicting her own belief. That is what
makes it so maddening to try to "dialogue" (misnomer if ever there
was one) with her: not so much her insultingness, but her constant
sabotage of communication. It is a complete waste of time--and the thing
is, it's not just one's own time, but hers also that is wasted, since I'm
sure (as you've often said too) that when she's not writing on TT she's
doing many truly worthwhile and admirable things. She should not be
participating in such a forum at all. I think it would be more charitable
just to leave her unanswered till she gets bored and signs off and goes
about her proper God-ordained business. She is neither learning nor
teaching here but is doubtless fruitful elsewhere.
D
I don't deny Christ is God any more than I deny
the Holy Spirit is God or the Father is God
JD
