Huh ??? I really hate to bring up a "big word " or three, but there really is such things as "economic trinity" and "immanent trinity." Function and essence.
I speak of essence and you quote passages that have to do with function. It appears that we do not disagree -- because we are not even talking about the same things.
jd
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> JD wrote:
> > What the verse does not accomplish is this:
> > it does not establish an event in which the
> > incarnate was not an equal partner.
>
> 1 Corinthians 15:27-28
> (27) For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things
> are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all
> things under him.
> (28) And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also
> himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be
> all in all.
>
> John 14:28
> (28) Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you.
> If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for
> my Father is greater than I.
>
> David Miller
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how
> you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend
> who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> he will be subscribed.
