Re: [TruthTalk] TT's ??

[Judy Taylor]

Thanks for your input Dean; I have no problem with Jesus having a human flesh body... but I have a "huge" insurmountable problem with the idea that Mary's child, the one called by the angel "the holy pure sinless offspring" born of her and called the Son of God" (Luke 1:36 Amp) ATST had a "fallen" Adamic nature.  Make no mistake this is nothing more than speculation by religious men who have no understanding about spiritual realities.   On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:54:00 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: cd:  Nor do we reject one or the other - we just don't relate to him in the fallen state of man- and I see us regenerated towards His higher state.  I am wondering why we cannot be understood on this statement - what force works against Judy and I on this?  Is it an us against them thingy or is it Satan that stills this seed?  There is no us against them with me there is only truth as best as I understand it.  Respectfully     From: Taylor These are great passages, Dean; they speak to his divinity, his being God. Ours has been a discussion of his humanity, his being human. To reject one or the other is to reject him.   cd: Yes I like them also-part of my favorite passages.Question: Did that divinity leave him while on earth-What does he say in the New Covenant that differs from Prov.8?   Bill