----- Original Message -----
Sent: January 17, 2006
16:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TT's
??
Thanks for your input Dean;
I have no problem with Jesus having a
human flesh body... but I have a "huge" insurmountable
problem
with the idea that Mary's child, the one
called by the angel "the holy pure sinless offspring" born of her
and called the Son of God" (Luke 1:36
Amp) ATST had a "fallen" Adamic nature. Make no mistake
this
is nothing more than speculation by
religious men who have no understanding about spiritual
realities.
cd: Nor do we reject one or
the other - we just don't relate to him in the fallen state of
man-
and I see us regenerated towards His
higher state. I am wondering why we cannot be understood
on this statement - what force works
against Judy and I on this? Is it an us against them
thingy or
is it Satan that stills this
seed? There is no us against them with me there is only
truth as best as
I understand it.
Respectfully
These are great passages, Dean; they speak to his
divinity, his being God. Ours has been a discussion of his
humanity, his being human. To reject one or the other is
to reject him.
cd: Yes I like them also-part of
my favorite passages.Question: Did that divinity leave him
while on earth-What does he say in the New Covenant that
differs from Prov.8?
Bill