Re: [TruthTalk] Joanna Williams - friend of some 10 years speaks on believing teens

[knpraise]

Your comments, Judy, have nothing to do with answering the question asked by Linda Shields.   I am thinking my answer is dead on  --   what, specifically , is there in that answer with which you disagree?  And why?

 

jd

 

 

Right JD, it is tough to argue with scripture when you know what it says -  such as

 

"The thought of foolishness is sin and the scorner is an abomination to men" (Prov 24:9)

"If thou sayest, Behold we knew it not, doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it?

and he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know it? and shall not he render to every man

according to his works? Vs.12

 

Oh that you walked in the wisdom of the author of Psalm 119 who writes by the Spirit of God:

"My flesh trembleth for fear of thee; and I am afraid of thy judgments" (Psalm 119:120) rather

than arguing with the wisdom of God and sliding around on the slippery slope....

 

 

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:49:54 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

There is no time limit in the scriptures, is there.  Further,  Paul certainly thought that the carnal babe in Christ  -   a significant portion of the Corinthian congregation, by the way  -   had been around long enough to have moved on, didn't he.   Yet,  they were still babes.  The implication?   They have all the time in the world to get it right.   Tough to argue with scripture, isn't it. jd

 

From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

And how long do you allow Believers to be “babes in Christ”, jd? Until the day they die? They will never get delivered if they are continually treated, and fed, like babies—on Pablum.  Coddling sin results in spineless, wimpy, self-absorbed babies.  izzy