Or, as on TT, theologically unknowing while
spiritually alive. This is much more the case.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 22, 2006 18:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
So true, so true KD
A man may be Theologically knowing while spiritually
DEAD..... Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Let me get this straight JD.
By Rad Fundies you are talking about people who
believe Genesis as it is
written - Right??
PS What is wrong with the Carroll Dean's and the
Pat Robertsons of this
world? You may have to eat those words one day
because both are busy
about what they believe God has called them to do
and who are you to
denigrate another man's servant. O thou Romans 14
theological expert...
It is a shame we will not be able to finish this thread, I
suppose, but I must say something here --
the conflict (speaking for myself) is not between science and
religion. It is between religion and fundamentalism
(radical fundamentalism, if you will.) Knowing that the
first step will not be last step for Rad Fundies, I prefer to deal
with the situation outside the school setting. The
church has done an excellent job in this regard with the High School
population -- but it has forsaken the University campus'
without a fight. Truth will win out if compared to that
which has no bearings. The failure, here, is with the
church and its seeming inability to continue with the college age
population. It -- religion - simply does not
need to be in collegiate curriculum to win the fight for the hearts and
minds of the college age student.
The church has done a shameful job with the older student, just as
it does with the unwanted-infant population. If the
church could place 1.4 million newborns each year --
abortion would be EASILY defeated. But , as long as we
think that after birth, it is all up to the infant,
well, the battle will rage.
In short -- the fundies (and not they alone) do
not want the kind of involvement that would make victory in either venue
almost undeniable. I do not want the Carroll Dean's and Pat
Robertsons of this world running anything of an evangelistic
nature.
jd
--------------
Original message -------------- From: "David Miller"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Lance wrote: > > If
Williams is a 'liberal loonie' then > > you are a 'sectarian
loonie' , David. > > I'm sectarian only in the sense
that the holy and the profane ought to be > separate. I am not
sectarian within the group of those who have submitted > unto
Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. > > Lance wrote:
> > He is a brother in Christ who believes > >
differently than you on some matters. > > Now, if that makes
him what you say > > then, that makes you what I say.
> > He is not a liberal loony for believing differently
from me. The moniker > was offered because of his statement
about how acknowledgement of our > Creator did not belong in
schools. He made an irrational statement, > assuming tha t CNN
reported him accurately. If he is a brother in Christ, > then I
expect to hear a retraction or clarification made soon as other
> believers correct him. If he is not a brother in Christ, then
he will > continue to support the working of iniquity that
seeks to remove the > acknowledgment of God our Creator from
the schools. What he said was very > damaging to our society,
to believers who want to acknowledge God the > Creator in their
study of origins. To think that science and the >
acknowledgement of God are incompatible is expected from scientists
but not > from theologians, and certainly not from the Right
Reverend Doctor Rowland > Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury.
> > David Miller > > ---------- >
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
may know how > you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to
receive posts from this lis t, send an email to >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have
a friend > who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and > he will be subscribed.
__________________________________________________ Do You
Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|