On 09 Jul 11:41, Jesús Martín Jiménez wrote: > 2014-07-09 11:21 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > > > On 09 Jul 11:14, Jesús Martín Jiménez wrote: > > > 2014-07-09 10:45 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > > > > > > > On 09 Jul 10:25, Jesús Martín Jiménez wrote: > > > > > Anyway, this is not the topic of this thread, and finally I found the > > > > > solution for the issue so, for the record, there weren't any > > dependency > > > > > between both modules, so I had to add an extra depends in one of the > > > > views. > > > > > > > > If you talk about > > > > > > > > > > https://bitbucket.org/zikzakmedia/trytond-sale_margin/commits/a85edbe77cde8e99d2e60f28fd5337d80c5ff699 > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I'm talking about it and [1] > > > > > > > > > > this is wrong, you must not add depends on fields that the method > > doesn't > > > > depend on. > > > > > > > > > > But, I've not added the depends on the method, but on the view [2] > > > > And what is: > > > > https://bitbucket.org/zikzakmedia/trytond-sale_margin/commits/a85edbe77cde8e99d2e60f28fd5337d80c5ff699#Lsale.pyT69 > > > > It was a refactored of the code, adding all existing dependences on an > inherited method.
That's wrong. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgp0N_2fgBwud.pgp
Description: PGP signature
