On 21/09/10 16:48 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: > Don't know, if you got me right. Language (including date format etc.) is > just a > choice of display in the client (same content, but different display of > data). So no difference between language and date in this respect.
No. Look at your computer, you can change the date format without changing the date. > Additionaly: > If there is a company that puts a policy to have the client used in one > specific language, I doubt it wants to allow the display of the date > format in user cutomization. At least it is absolutely unlogic. Why not? Why user should use the standard date format? I know many people that doesn't like the standard format fo their language. > > It is a developper choice to define which fields are translatable and it is > > a > > company choice to define in which languages. > > Which sense does it make to restrict a company from the choice, which fields > they want to have translated at all (and to impose it solely on the developer, > who never will know about the specific demands of different enterprises)? Because making a field translatable has impact on how the code is written, how the database is performant etc. This is clearly a design choice! -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpPmMlplTnGR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
