On 17/11/11 17:06 +0100, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
> * Okko  [2011-11-11 18:00 +0100]:
> 
> >During the production workshop at TUL2011 we have discussed this new
> >module. What is clear that many have a need for this module and that
> >possible features are endless. Most of all it is important we make a
> >start with a simple but generic module. After the workshop we have
> >decided to do a joint contribution to make this new module available.
> 
> Who will be the copyright owners of the code?
> 
> According to me the copyright should be shared amongst people
> contributing to the funding because this can be viewed as a contract
> between some people and a company/person to create the module. But the
> people doing the coding should probably also appear in the COPYRIGHT
> file.

Indeed, it will depend of the contract between the contributors and the
authors.
Until now, B2CK has always request in his contract the COPYRIGHT of the
code. But we did not define in the request.

Moreover, if the copyright is shared between all the contributors that
also means that anyone of those contributors can "relicense" (as the
owner) the module with the license of his choice.

But as the situation is unclear, I propose to put our contract on the
offer. So contributors that disagree with it, can take back his
contribution. Like that we will have a clear situation.

-- 
Cédric Krier

B2CK SPRL
Rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Liège
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

Attachment: pgpr1zbey1Alp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to