Àngel Àlvarez Serra wrote:
2012/11/8 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>:
On 08/11/12 17:28 +0100, Raimon Esteve wrote:
No, but I don't think it is needed (personaly I never used it)
When a customer need to report some record and this record isn't a number
sequence (not reference), how to find this record? by ID
I think it is a design issue if the only way to make reference to a
record is by the technical id. Normally, the rec_name should be good
enough (but sometimes some more information is required).
On Mail or Phone support, ID helps us to find the correct record,
sometimes it's dificult to find records only by references, because
products had extra large names and only last 2 chars differs or
simply find correct stock move.
Yes, Àngel has explained very well one of the reasons to access records
by id: ID helps us to find the correct record, sometimes it's difficult
to find records only by references or names.
I agree with Raimon and Ángel that if the Goto feature is removed, ID
could be added in search toolbar (filter) to find a record by ID. I
don't think that the users could be confused by adding always the ID
field in search toolbar.
Jordi
--
Jordi Esteve
Consultor Zikzakmedia SL
jest...@zikzakmedia.com
Mòbil 679 170 693
Zikzakmedia SL
Dr. Fleming, 28, baixos
08720 Vilafranca del Penedès
Tel 93 890 2108
--
tryton-dev@googlegroups.com mailing list
