On 08 Mar 01:22, Cédric Krier wrote: > Hi, > > I just strated «grafting» changeset to series and I discover a side > effect of the named branch. > The hgroundup hook updates the old issue with branch backport > information [1] which is great but it also makes roundup to set the > status to chatting. I don't feel to go back to all «grafted» issue to > reset the status to resolved. So I propose that the hgroundup hook set > always the status of the issue to resolved. This means that when working > on an issue which will require many changesets over a long period, the > status should be reset to in-progress manually because it will be set to > resolved on each commit. > > What do you think?
By the way over past few months, I had only one issue where I push a changeset but did not want to resolve the issue. I think default behavior should match the major case. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpbwUSGnHZpl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
