On 06 Apr 12:51, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton-dev] Bugtracker access right" (Sun, 6 Apr 2014 > 11:52:46 +0200): > > On 06 Apr 10:02, Cédric Krier wrote: > > > On 06 Apr 01:39, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > > > * Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton-dev] Bugtracker access right" (Sun, 6 Apr > > > > 2014 01:15:12 +0200): > > > > > > > > > On 06 Apr 00:54, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > > > > > * Cédric Krier: " [tryton-dev] Bugtracker access right" (Sat, 5 Apr > > > > > > 2014 23:52:40 +0200): > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For now, every user had the right to remove any msg or file from > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > bugtracker. I find it very annoying as we already got (spam)bot > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > does it (needed to retire the corrupted user) and also users who > > > > > > > wrongly remove message preventing to have a clear picture of the > > > > > > > history of an issue. > > > > > > > So I write a patch that only allows Admin users to remove: > > > > > > > http://codereview.tryton.org/4931002/ > > > > > > > The patch is already temporary applied on the instance for testing > > > > > > > purpose. > > > > > > > In case if someone really wants with a valid reason to remove a > > > > > > > message then he could ask to one of the Admin. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hiding a msg to replace it with a new one is the only way to correct > > > > > > messages. > > > > > > > > > > This is a false idea because you don't replace it as everyone will any > > > > > way receive the message by email. It is much better to have a second > > > > > message explaining the correction than trying badly to hide the error. > > > > > > > > Of course it is possible to replace a message silently as long as there > > > > is no one on the nosy list. And then still not *everyone* will get the > > > > messages, but only nosy list. And for later reference it is still > > > > cleaner > > > > to only have a corrected message. > > > > > > No it is not. It is rewritting history. > > No, it is not. It is unlinking a msg from an issue. And linking a better > suitable msg to the issue. A tracker is not a VCS and history is preserved > completely and transparently (take a look at the bottom of the issue).
Yes, it is historized so it is pointless to remove it except creating confusion. > > It is specially because people > > > has this behavior that I want to remove the button. > > First it was the spambot, now you changed your mind? No, please read correctly. > > It should only be > > > used to remove inappropriate message and this should be exceptional. > > > For example, bugs.python.org, bugs.gentoo.org (and as far as I see > > > bugs.debian.org) don't have such button. > > > > This is also the configuration of roundup tracker. > > Hiding of messages AFAIK is a default feature of roundup. Don't know what you name default feature. But as I pointed one of the big user of roundup (Python) removed/did not implement the feature. And the bugtracker of roundup has exactly the same behavior as I did in my patch. > Please don't get in over-control. We have to when people doesn't behave correctly. And I bet we will have to do more overtime with finer access right to fields etc. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpgs8QoI_utU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
