On 27 Feb 17:22, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > 2015-02-27 16:45 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > > On 27 Feb 15:47, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > >> 2015-02-27 15:45 GMT+01:00 Albert Cervera i Areny <alb...@nan-tic.com>: > >> > 2015-02-27 13:00 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I would like to push the issue3320 [1] before the 3.6 release. > >> >> As it is quite a big workflow change, I would like to have feedback on > >> >> it. > >> > > >> > Though I did not test the patch: > >> > > >> > - I like the general workflow and it is, in fact, what we're already > >> > using in our installs > >> > - I would consider making it possible to use the "convert button" > >> > several times. So it is possible to create another sale instead of > >> > creating a new one and using the origin or instead of duplicating the > >> > existing sale. We did that change and renamed "Convert" to "Create > >> > sale". In fact, for me "Convert" is misleading as a conversion is when > >> > you convert a lead into a paying customer [1]. > > > > I think the convert is the correct term. > > Could you point to some place where the term "Convert" is used in the > same sense that it is being used in Tryton? Everything I can find uses > the term for getting paying customers or paid sales. Not converting a > lead into a quotation which is the first step of the sale.
I think it is a matter of usage. It could fit the general meaning or not. The user will decide when he does the convertion so he will decide the meaning. He could convert only when the sale is sure to be done or he could convert at a state where he is not sure at all. So I don't think it is wrong to call a button that "convert" an object into an other object "convert". -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
