On 04 May 01:39, Axel Braun wrote: > > > Am Samstag, 2. Mai 2015 18:50:03 UTC+2 schrieb Cédric Krier: > > > > On 01 May 06:50, Axel Braun wrote: > > > > While my way of doing doesn't depend on the order: > > > > > > > > - buy 10 products @ 10€ > > > > - cost price: 10€ > > > > - book landed cost: 1€ > > > > - cost price: 11€ > > > > - buy 10 products @ 12€ > > > > - cost price: 11.5€ > > > > - book landed cost: 2€ > > > > - cost price: 12.5€ > > > > > > > > > > Thats fine so far. The fun starts when you sell out stuff. In you > > method, > > > you need to roll back, or get wrong COGS on the sale. > > > > COGS is something completly different than the computation of the cost > > price. > > COGS is always wrong and there are very few countries that does such > > accounting. > > > > Now I dont understand. In case of moving average valuation, the calculated > cost price is the basis for a COGS posting on a sale (for example). > This is not depending on the country, but its a comany's decision if a > material is valuated at standard or at moving average price.
I mean the all concept of COGS is only used in very few countries. An such practice is way more complicated than what does others. > > > As the name specifies, the moving average price is moving, and not > > fixed. > > > And by this, it is time depending > > > > > > Extreme case: you get a bonus on your purchase at the end of the month > > or > > > year. Or get transport costs charged. How ill you apply this to your > > stock > > > price in your case? you cant, unless you book it to a price difference > > > account. Thats the problem with your method > > > > As I said in case of anglo-saxon stock accounting, when the cost price > > of a product is recomputed, the wizard will ask to the user where to put > > the price difference (using the already existing update cost price > > wizard). For me, it is the easiest way to manage it and I have > > personnaly no interest to make it smoother but if someone wants to make > > a better proposal, patch is welcome. > > > > Using the wizard, do you check the posting against a valid account? I would > not allow too much freedom here, as this material valuation is a set of fix > rules. Posting nonsense may result in problems once you are audited by tax > authorities. That's not the problem of Tryton but of the management/accounting team. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
