> > >Not with the current view.js since it produces <table>'s (which is > >probably very fine for tree views, but not for form views concerning > >the current matter). Hence this poc to replace form.container > >element with <div>. Now of course, out of the box div's won't look > >like the gtk client's forms, they need to be applied a grid system. > >I guess you could dev your own grid system to prevent it to be > >responsive, but that would probably be a lot of work. Or you could > >use an existing grid system (like bootstrap or something else) but > >then... well, it would be responsive out of the box > > You're saying that it's impossible to remove the responsive part of > bootstrap, am I right? >
I'm not saying it is impossible to do anything, I'm saying that creating a non-responsive grid-system either from scratch or from a natively (mobile first in bootstrap-case) responsive system would require extra work. And I am REALLY having a hard time seeing the point of it On a desktops/laptops, it would have the same look and feel as the gtk client. On small devices on which the gtk client doesn't work (hard to reproduce an unexistent behavior), it would look slightly different <https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-aiqeNIn-Xmw/UxcnzUAYVzI/AAAAAAAAAK0/yuCWTlZTWEI/s1600/592x360_tryton_gtk.png> For reference here is a screenshot of what gtk would look like on a 592x360 display which is in my own experience the most common size (about 30%) of the device of mobile users. So if you find someone who is willing to spend time to take the responsiveness out of bootstrap or write a non-responsive grid system to achieve something unusable.... why not. (It won't be me) So just in case you haven't tried the code-review here a screenshot of sao with the patch on a desktop: <https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-AJeKR1myD8I/Uxcpm6d_VRI/AAAAAAAAALA/CzhHzgwlm5s/s1600/sao_responsive.png> except for the un-implemented freatures and margin/padding tweakings needed, it looks pretty much the same to me as the current sao layout > My opinion is that your patch is welcome as long as it can mimic the > GTK client behavior. > Imho it does, with additional features for screens on which no-one would run the GTK client
