Am Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2018, 14:49:25 CEST schrieb Cédric Krier: > On 2018-05-09 13:32, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: > > We've detected a strange behavior (at least for our costumers) when > > using yearly deprecation on a company that it's fiscal year does not end > > on December. The current behavior is to always create the deprecation > > lines on December but our user expected to have it created on the last > > month of the fiscal year (which for us is September). > > > > I'm wondering if we should change the current module behavior to always > > use the last month of the fiscal year when creating the deprecation > > table of an asset. > > > > Thoughts? > > The problem is that fiscal years are not guarantee to have the same > length so the last month may not always be the same for the lifetime of > the asset. (This can happen on special case when a company readjust the > fiscal year)
Exactly, and this is highly exceptional. Mostly a company changes the fiscal year only in case they change the legal form, or similar. As this is the exception, it should not rule the depreciation. > So I would say that it will be better to define on the asset instead of > depending on fiscal year when it is yearly which month to use. And maybe > we could also have such option for the day of the month (with a fallback > to the last day of it is out of the month). Each asset has its own depreciation lifecycle (e.g. linear over 3 years), anyway, you have to accrue per fiscal year and write-off accordingly. Best, Axel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/7140358.C7N3vBQpQX%40t520.axxite.internal.
