I do not care for the name.
I do not care for the version number.
I do not care for UI. (definetly)
I do not care for internals.
I could not care less for the money M$ spent on it.
What I care about is behaviour. And it is different. And that is why adapter
is needed.
fedor.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] limit fixes
>
>
> Fedor Karpelevitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > what's wrong with another adapter? MSSQL 7 is a different
> DB from MSSQL 6.5
> > and it should have it's own adapter. Any good reason against it?
>
> Huh--how is it a different database? Isn't it just a newer version of
> the same RDBMS (which was Sybase a long, long time ago)? I cut my
> teeth on 6.5, and have used 7 a bit, and the UI is very similar. Are
> the internals that different, then? I would see M$ throwing away all
> the money they spent to buy that database in the first place for a new
> one...
>
> Daniel
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
