"Stephen Haberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Also, I lurked on Avalon-dev for awhile and will say, from what I
Ok, will do that, too. Sigh. Must. Stop. Sleeping. :-)
>gathered, they are sticklers for backwards-compatibility. To the point
>where it kills some of the initiatives they want to do with the code
>base.
Hm. Maybe my attitude towards Avalon is unfairly biased because it
comes from developers who I found that they have "jeden Monat eine
neue Sau durchs Dorf getrieben" (... "that they came up with an new
and cunning plan every month") and never really released any stable
Turbine code (finally Martin did which I still consider a feat getting
things like your build system broken in middle-development.).
I honestly promise to take a deeper look at Avalon than I already have
and if we can really get more synergies here, I'm more than happy
to use their code.
After all, I came to this Turbine because, I wanted to write
applications for a framework, not write a framework for applications. :-)
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
