On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 10:38, Aaron Smuts wrote: > The http receiver is a servlet. We'll have to make something else I guess.
Okay. I'm not saying we need something else. So what you are saying is that the http lateral reeiver acts like a lateral cache, but presents an interface for users to send commands? > It might have been easier just to go through and test than remove. Yes, but the amount of work in cleaning up and refactoring all those laterals seemed pretty high. > Junit is not going to meet our needs for testing this stuff. What will > count as testing? I was just acting on your statement that the TCP lateral is the only one that is tested. I'd rather put my effort into that then refactoring all the other ones (there is a ludicrous amount of duplicated code between them all right now). As far as testing, Junit where possible seems like a good idea. Maybe we need some scripts as well that launch more than one JVM, but they have to be written in a way that everybody can use them. -- jt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
