Thanks for the input. I actually got it working today in my dev environment and so far so good. We are definitely going to put it through some tests. I'll let everyone know how they work out and will be more than happy to help with fixes.
----- Original Message ----- From: "James Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Karl Baum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Turbine JCS Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 5:37 PM Subject: Re: stable version of jcs > > > > "Karl Baum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Also, I was wondering if JCS is at a production ready state currently? > > > From: "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Debatable. > > On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 01:07, Karl Baum wrote: > > Are they any specific aspects of JCS which need work before it is production > > ready? > > Best to try it. Some (me) are using it in production without major > issues. Others (those scarab kids) have run into some problems. > > The big problem is that there are no comprehensive tests, so I at least > find it difficult to say how solid each piece is. > > However, there is a lot of good code there, and the problems are getting > fixed as people find them. It is definitely worth a try. > > -- jt > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
